Review of UK and world papers and coverage of UK and global journalism stories and Journalism History for Friday 11th September 2026.
Journalism is the first draft of history and these daily reports seek to provide an online briefing of the history of journalism for each day featured.
The Chartered Institute of Journalists remembers all the professional journalists and media workers murdered and killed while doing their work this year in all parts of the world and remember the immense sacrifice of those who gave their lives to the profession in the past. We send our condolences to their families, friends and professional colleagues.
The Chartered Institute of Journalists wishes to make it absolutely clear that all our reporting of stories about journalism and media saying ‘reports’ ‘writes for’ ‘briefing’ or attribution followed by colon, does not imply or mean our agreement or endorsing with the quoted headline or linked story. Our policy is impartiality & strictly apolitical.
X posts:-
BBC News Papers’ Review analysing front pages of UK National Newspapers for Friday 11th September 2026: “‘Day that changed the world forever’ and ‘Mayors plot hols tax.'” See: https://x.com/CIoJournalist/status/2098255712128266491 & https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cqlwze9qgrlo
To:
Quentin Letts writes for Daily Mail: “The BBC used to scrutinise politicians with calm balance. The Leftist aggression of its so-called star interviewer Emma Barnett toward Kemi Badenoch was just snooty and crass.” See: https://x.com/CIoJournalist/status/2098073281614008687 & https://www.dailymail.com/…/QUENTIN-LETTS-BBC-balance…
CIoJ LinkedIn news edited by Liz Justice
Channel 4 is set to slash its workforce by 28 percent — approximately 340 jobs — by the end of this year. See: https://lnkd.in/p/ei6_pYmp & https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwyzprn3gkgo
Latest CIoJ LinkedIn news feed stories edited by Liz Justice at: https://www.linkedin.com/groups/63500/
-o-
Chartered Institute of Journalists Young Journalist of the Year Awards 2027
The CIoJ 2027 Young Journalist Awards open for entries in four weeks, and if you are aged 30 or younger, you are invited to enter the awards for free.
You can access details to start preparing for your entry in advance by looking at the categories and previous winners at https://registration.livegroup.co.uk/youngjournalistaward/
You do not have to be a CIoJ member, but you do have to work as a freelance or staff journalist and feel your published work has made an impact in the 12 months ending on 31st August 2026.
This is a brilliant way to both showcase your work and enhance your career path by adding an award win to your CV.
The award entries open on Wednesday 30th September.
-o-
Chartered Institute of Journalists Young Journalist of the Year Awards 2026
Coverage by Hold The Front Page
Business and Financial Journalist of the year category sponsored by Cavendish
‘We’re delighted that Cavendish Tech and Innovation is sponsoring the Business/Financial Journalist and Health of the Year categories at The Chartered Institute of Journalists (CIoJ) Young Journalist of the Year Awards 2026. This comes as part of our ongoing commitment to supporting the media industry and championing new journalistic talent.
These awards celebrate the very best young journalists across the UK, recognising outstanding achievements by those aged 30 and under. Specifically, the Business/Financial Journalist of the Year award highlights impactful stories that cover the business/financial aspects of a particular company, sector, or issue – from funding and corporate governance to financial outcomes and strategic insight.
Cavendish report on the Awards: ‘The future of journalism is in safe hands – as was clear at The Chartered Institute of Journalists (CIoJ) 2026 Young Journalist of the Year Awards in London this week. Cavendish was proud to sponsor the Business/Financial category and to have supported the new Health category this year – and we were genuinely blown away by the quality, insight, and expertise on display.’ See Cavendish Tech and Innovation film report at: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/cavendishtech_awards-journalism-pr-activity-7440318530635358208-JG3c/
Young News Reporter of the Year category sponsored by Romail Gulzar FRSA and the Pukaar Media Group in Leicester.
The Pukaar Group is the parent of award-winning brands including Pukaar News, Pukaar Magazine, Leicester Curry Awards and the Ethnic Media Awards.
Publishers of Pukaar Magazine and Pukaar News • Leicester based news agency and Leicester’s Pukaar Magazine- Celebrating The Diversity of Leicester.
Romail Gulzar said: “I am deeply honoured to once again serve as a judge for the Chartered Institute of Journalists (CIoJ) Young Journalist Awards 2026.
It’s inspiring to witness and support the next generation of talented journalists who are shaping the future of our profession. Together, we celebrate their dedication, creativity, and commitment to truth.”
See: https://www.cioj.org/young-journalists-awards-2026/
The Winners of the 2026 Young Journalist of the Year Awards Ceremony presented by Riz Lateef- broadcaster and principal presenter for BBC London TV’s flagship early evening news on BBC One in the City of London on 17th March 2026.
Awards announced at the Leonardo Royal Hotel, Tower Hill, following the Society of Editors Annual Conference. A full list of winners, what they reported on and judging panels’comments at: https://registration.livegroup.co.uk/youngjournalistaward/winners2026/
Overall CIoJ Young Journalist of the Year– Charlotte Anderson, Romford Recorder/Local London (pictured below).
Charlotte said: “I’m incredibly honoured to be recognised in this way; particularly as local news is so important to journalism and also vitally important to local democracy as well.”
Young Journalist of the Year Award sponsored and supported by The Live Group
YOUNG BUSINESS/FINANCIAL JOURNALIST OF THE YEAR– Sponsored by Cavendish Tech and Innovation.
Winner Nikou Asgari, Financial Times
Commended Lucy Frost, International Financial Review
Finalist Sofia Gerace, mlex.com
Celebrating CIoJ Young Business/Financial Journalist of the Year Award Winner Nikou Asgari (Financial Times). With CIoJ President Gerald Bowey, Principal BBC London Newscaster Riz Lateef, Rhodri Harries MD Cavendish Tech and Health, and FT’s film & video revise editor Simon Greaves.
Second image Celebrating Commended CIoJ Young Business/Financial Journalist of the Year Award Finalist Lucy Frost, International Financing Review. See: https://ifre.com/author/618/lucy-frost With CIoJ President Gerald Bowey, BBC London Newscaster Riz Lateef, and Rhodri Harries MD Cavendish Tech and Health
YOUNG NEWS REPORTER OF THE YEAR– Sponsored by Pukaar Group Leicester.
Winner Isabel (Issy) Clarke, Southwark News
Finalist Charlotte Anderson, Romford Recorder/Local London
Finalist Megan Owen, BBC London
YOUNG ENVIRONMENT JOURNALIST OF THE YEAR
Winner Ellen Ormesher, DeSmog UK and Shetland Times
Finalist Charlotte Anderson, Romford Recorder/London Local
YOUNG CAMPAIGNING JOURNALIST OF THE YEAR
Winner: Charlotte Anderson, Romford Recorder – online and in print
Commended Finalist: Patricia Figueiredo, mlex.com
YOUNG FEATURE WRITER OF THE YEAR
Winner Simon Ezra-Jackson, The Damned, print magazine, The New World.
Highly Commended Joseph Watt, Ultramarathon, The Offset.
Finalist Annaliese Smith, moretohistory.com, Birmingham Dispatch, Discover Wildlife
YOUNG POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT OF THE YEAR
Winner Amy Gibbons, The Daily Telegraph
Finalist Jiji Ahn, BBC News
Finalist Jasmine Cameron-Chileshe, ITV National News
YOUNG ARTS JOURNALIST OF THE YEAR
Winner Sofia de la Cruz, Wallpaper
Finalist Katie Chambers, The Stage
Finalist Evie Glen, Metal magazine
YOUNG TRAVEL JOURNALIST OF THE YEAR
Winner Kira Richards, National Geographic(UK)/Sunday Times
Alice Barnes-Brown, Travel Weekly
Annaliese Smith, Independent/Wired For Adventure
YOUNG HEALTH JOURNALIST OF THE YEAR
Winner Amy Borrett, Financial Times
Finalist Ella Kipling, Mirror/Wales Online
Finalist Eliza Slawther, Pink Sheet
YOUNG SPORTS JOURNALIST OF THE YEAR
Winner Jamie Barton, CNN Digital Sports, London
Finalist Aryan Jolly, The Real EFL/The Football Deck/Wisden
Finalist Joseph Ryan, Kent Standard/Football Writers’ Association
YOUNG SHOW BIZ JOURNALIST OF THE YEAR
Winner Evie Glen, The List, online magazine
Finalist Ella Kipling, The Mirror
Many thanks to Riz Lateef, award-winning broadcaster and the principal presenter for BBC London TV’s flagship early evening news on BBC One.
She praised and presented each award-winning journalist.
LBC Breakfast Show Presenter Nick Ferrari praised the winners and finalists saying: ‘I don’t envy the world you are entering which has major challenges which are greater than I ever had. Having to get to grip with all the fake news and Artifical Intelligence- which I have to say scares me. Your work is fantastic and we have been rightly told the future of the industry is in great hands.’
Gerald Bowey is the present President of the Chartered Institute of Journalists and Caroline Roddis, the Vice-President. Their roles were confirmed in a handover event at the Reform Club in Central London on Tuesday 20th February 2024.
Bowey emphasised the guidance, support, and encouragement that had been at the heart of the Institute for 140 years and announced the launch of a new Young Journalist of the Year awards scheme that would encourage journalists under 30 years of age to enter a range of categories.
Commenting Bowey said: “the Institute is focused on supporting working journalists, both in-house and freelance, in the workplace, as a trade union, and in sustaining journalists in difficult circumstances as a charitable trust.
-o-
Two Fellows of the Chartered Institute of Journalists at the heart of British Journalism History
T.P.O’Connor founder of London campaigning evening newspaper The Star in 1888 and Arthur Burrows the first journalist and news presenter at the B.B.C. 1922.
-o-
CIoJ member Clare Hollingworth OBE (1911-2017) – The first war correspondent to report the outbreak of World War II, described as “the scoop of the century”
Listen to Imperial War Museum archive interview with Clare recorded in 2001
-o-
CIoJ X news feed at: https://x.com/CIoJournalist
CIoJ LinkedIn news feed edited by Liz Justice at: https://www.linkedin.com/groups/63500/
CIoJ Facebook news feed at: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100077475452242
Official CIoJ LinkedIn site for Institute news and projects at: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-chartered-institute-of-journalists/posts/?feedView=all
Chartered Institute of Journalists website at: https://www.cioj.org/
Review of UK national newspapers for Friday 11th September 2026
The UK national newspapers — Friday 11 September 2026
These ten front pages for Friday 11 September 2026 produce an unusually coherent newspaper review. Two anniversaries and two immediate political/economic arguments dominate: 25 years since the 9/11 attacks; the proposed English tourist levy; today’s renewed Commons battle over assisted dying; and the inflationary consequences of the Middle East conflict.
We begin with The Times, which leads on the cost of Britain’s energy system:
“Households face £100 on bills to pay cost of wind”
The paper reports that households could ultimately pay an additional £100 on their energy bills because of the cost of switching off wind turbines when the electricity network cannot accommodate the power they generate. The Times says the National Audit Office has calculated that so-called constraint costs could rise substantially as Britain expands renewable generation.
There is politics above the masthead story too. Under:
“Making London poorer won’t help other regions, PM is warned”
former housing secretary Steve Reed warns Prime Minister Andy Burnham against allowing his devolution agenda to be perceived as benefiting other regions at London’s expense. Burnham rejects the suggestion that his approach is anti-London.
And there is a striking security story down the right-hand side:
“Be prepared to ban masks at protests, police ordered”
with the Home Secretary reported to be telling police chiefs to prepare to use new powers against face coverings at protests.
The Daily Telegraph chooses the new tourist levy as its lead:
“Labour mayors plot 5pc tourist tax”
with the subheading:
“Backlash from hotels and pubs as families face an extra £198 on bill for staycation”
The underlying government announcement is that regional mayors in England will be allowed to introduce an Overnight Visitor Levy, calculated as a percentage of accommodation costs. Importantly, individual mayors will decide whether to use the power and at what rate; the 5 per cent figure is therefore not a universal tax already imposed across England. The hospitality industry is strongly opposed, while ministers argue that locally raised money can be reinvested in services, public spaces and attractions.
The Telegraph also reports:
“Hamas praises Miliband’s Israel sanctions”
following Britain’s restrictions concerning Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank. That headline puts Hamas’s reaction at the centre of the story rather than the British government’s stated rationale for the measures.
And beneath the main photograph:
“Into battle for Bayeux”
as visitors queue at the British Museum for the opening of the Bayeux Tapestry exhibition.
The Daily Mail takes much the same tourist-tax story but deploys considerably more combative language. Its banner reads:
“WELFARE PARTY STRIKES AGAIN”
and its enormous headline:
“BURNHAM’S HOLIDAY TAX TO HAMMER FAMILIES ON UK BREAKS”
The Mail characterises the levy as another financial burden on families and says it could ultimately cost holidaymakers £1.6 billion. That is the newspaper’s framing of the policy rather than the government’s description of it: ministers present the levy as an optional devolution measure allowing mayors to raise money locally. Industry modelling cited in the debate suggests a fully implemented 5 per cent levy could have significant effects on employment and economic output, although the eventual consequences will depend upon which mayors introduce a levy and at what rate.
Alongside it is a court story:
“Teacher found guilty of sex with teen boy ALSO abused two schoolgirls”
Here the wording reflects convictions rather than allegations: the Mail identifies the defendant as PE teacher Bronwen James.
The Sun goes still further in its treatment of the tourist levy. Across the top:
“WORKING PEOPLE WHACKED”
and then:
“Burnham vows cost of living help then taxes staycations… WHAT THE HOL, PM?”
The pun and the accusation are unmistakably tabloid editorial presentation. The paper says tourist chiefs fear tens of thousands of jobs could be at risk and presents the measure as contradicting the Prime Minister’s emphasis on easing household pressures.
So already this morning we have an interesting illustration of newspaper framing: the same policy becomes the Telegraph’s “tourist tax”, the Mail’s “holiday tax”, and the Sun’s “WHAT THE HOL, PM?” Government supporters, by contrast, call it an Overnight Visitor Levy designed to give local leaders greater financial autonomy.
The Guardian also leads on the levy, but from the perspective of the hospitality industry:
“‘A hammer blow’: plan for English tourist tax angers hotel industry”
The quotation marks matter. “A hammer blow” is the industry’s description, not the Guardian asserting as fact that the policy will have that effect.
The paper says hospitality businesses had expected tighter restrictions on the powers and quotes warnings that the measure could increase holiday costs and threaten employment. Regional mayors, meanwhile, argue that visitor levies can help pay for the infrastructure and attractions on which tourism itself depends.
But the Guardian has another substantial front-page investigation:
“Film reveals IDF systems used in Gaza killings”
The report concerns a documentary drawing upon testimony from former Israeli military and intelligence personnel. Those are serious claims, and the front page appropriately presents them as the findings and testimony contained in the film rather than as judicially established conclusions.
And economically:
“Borrowing costs soar as investors dump bonds”
which connects directly with the Financial Times’s lead story.
The Financial Times takes us from Westminster to the global economy:
“Oil price surge and signs of stubborn inflation reignite global bond sell-off”
Its accompanying points tell the story succinctly:
“US 30-year yield soars”
“Saudi output falls”
“Crude at $107 a barrel”
“Trump in $1tn vote pledge”
This is potentially one of the most consequential stories on today’s front pages. Escalating Middle Eastern tensions and disruption to oil supplies have pushed crude prices above $100 a barrel, reviving fears that energy costs will feed back into inflation. Long-term government borrowing costs have consequently risen sharply in several major economies. The FT’s latest reporting puts oil at around $108 a barrel, while US long-term borrowing costs have reached levels not seen for nearly two decades.
That matters in Britain too: higher gilt yields increase government borrowing costs and can reduce the Chancellor’s room for manoeuvre at the Budget.
But the FT gives considerable space to today’s anniversary as well:
“Liberty lights US marks 25 years after 9/11”
with the Tribute in Light illuminating the Manhattan skyline.
And the 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks becomes the dominant theme for several other papers.
The i Paper uses an image from Ground Zero beneath:
“The day that changed the world”
and reminds readers:
“25 years on from the 9/11 terrorist attacks, America remembers”
The paper records the 2,977 people killed in the attacks, including 67 Britons, and considers how September 11 reshaped international politics.
It also asks why Donald Trump would not be president without 9/11 — an analytical proposition rather than a straight-news assertion.
And, like several of the other papers, the i flags the tourist levy:
“New tourist tax powers for mayors sparks backlash”
The Independent approaches the anniversary through contemporary British national security:
“MI5 chief: We’re in more danger now than on 9/11”
Sir Ken McCallum’s underlying argument is somewhat more nuanced than that arresting headline. The MI5 director-general says today’s threat environment is broader and more complex than in 2001: Islamist terrorism remains a danger, but intelligence agencies must also confront hostile-state activity, cyberattack and sabotage.
His central warning is against preparing merely to fight the last war. The next strategic shock, he says, may already be developing somewhere governments and intelligence agencies are not looking.
The Independent therefore uses the anniversary less as commemoration than as a question about what has changed during the intervening quarter-century.
The Daily Mirror provides perhaps the most personal treatment of September 11:
“9/11 and its toxic cloud of death still claims victims today. I live with legacy of what it’s done to me”
and:
“25 YEARS LATER… MIRROR’S ANDY LINES ON THE DAY THAT CHANGED THE WORLD”
Its aerial photograph of Lower Manhattan dominates the upper half of the page, while the newspaper returns to Ground Zero to examine the continuing health consequences for people exposed to the dust and toxic material released by the destruction of the World Trade Center.
But its principal splash concerns today’s assisted-dying debate. Dame Esther Rantzen says:
“IT’S TOO LATE FOR ME”
The Mirror reports that Dame Esther, who has terminal cancer and supports changing the law, is now too physically frail to travel to Dignitas in Switzerland. She is appealing to MPs as the assisted-dying legislation returns to the Commons.
And that takes us naturally to the Daily Express, whose entire front page is devoted to the same debate.
Above a photograph of terminally ill campaigner Hannah Slater, 38, comes the appeal:
“JUST PASS THE RIGHT TO DIE BILL FOR PEOPLE LIKE ME”
and along the bottom:
“DAME ESTHER: IT’S TOO LATE FOR ME TO GO TO DIGNITAS”
This is explicitly the case for changing the law, presented through people with terminal diagnoses.
The political position is more contested than the front page alone might suggest. Supporters argue that the legislation would give terminally ill adults choice and control over the circumstances of their deaths. Opponents — including disability campaigners and some medical and religious groups — argue that safeguards may be insufficient and that vulnerable people could feel pressure to end their lives.
There is also a constitutional dimension because MPs are considering how to proceed after the previous legislation stalled in the House of Lords, with disagreement over whether the Parliament Acts should ultimately be used to overcome resistance from peers.
And the papers overall…
There are four quite distinct versions of Britain on this Friday morning.
The first is about the cost of living and taxation. The Telegraph, Mail, Sun and Guardian all lead on the same proposed visitor levy, but their vocabulary demonstrates how much editorial framing matters. “Tourist tax”, “holiday tax”, “WORKING PEOPLE WHACKED” and “hammer blow” all present the policy through the prospective cost to visitors or the hospitality industry. The government’s counter-case — that elected mayors should be able to raise and retain revenue for their own communities — is much less visually prominent on those front pages.
The second is 9/11, twenty-five years on. The i remembers “The day that changed the world”. The Mirror concentrates on the continuing human and medical legacy. The Independent asks whether Britain’s security challenges are now even more complex. And the Financial Times uses the illuminated Manhattan skyline as an image of remembrance. The approaches range from history and commemoration to public health, geopolitics and present-day security.
The third is assisted dying, where the Mirror and particularly the Express give powerful prominence to campaigners seeking a change in the law. It remains important in an impartial review to recognise that these are arguments within a deeply contested ethical and legislative debate rather than a settled national consensus.
And finally there is the economic warning running through the FT, Guardian and, indirectly, the Times: oil above $100, renewed inflationary pressure and rising government borrowing costs. That may be less visually dramatic than some of today’s political splashes, but its consequences could eventually reach interest rates, mortgages, government spending and household bills.
So, in broad terms, the proposed tourist levy provides this morning’s principal domestic political row; Britain and America mark a quarter-century since the attacks of September 11, 2001; MPs return to one of Parliament’s most difficult moral questions over assisted dying; and behind them all, another surge in the price of energy is beginning to cast a fresh shadow over the global economy.
And that’s the review of Friday morning’s UK national newspaper front pages.
Review of front pages of UK’s regional England, and nation Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland newspapers
The UK nations and regions — Friday 11 September 2026
The ten papers comprise three Scottish titles, two Welsh titles, two Northern Irish titles and two English regional newspapers, plus Metro, which is a UK-wide free newspaper rather than strictly an English regional title. All ten editions are dated Friday 11 September 2026.
We begin in Northern Ireland with The Irish News, where an everyday public service problem supplies the principal headline:
“Royal Mail letters ‘take a month to get to Derry’”
The paper reports complaints from SDLP MLA Mark H Durkan about what he describes as “pronounced and persistent” postal delays, including hospital appointments, social-housing offers and other important correspondence.
It is a very characteristic regional-newspaper splash: an issue which would probably struggle for prominence on a UK national front page but which can have significant consequences for individual communities.
The accompanying photograph supplies another strikingly local story:
“Peril on Pump Street”
A former convent in Derry is reported to be at risk of collapse, with shipping containers erected to protect pedestrians.
Elsewhere:
“Goldmine plan could ‘decimate’ Catholics, priests say”
The quotation marks are important. This is the expressed concern of Catholic clergy about a proposed goldmine in County Tyrone and its potential consequences for local communities and churches, rather than an established consequence of the development.
And:
“Older rural ‘drug mules’”
reports concerns that vulnerable older people in rural areas are being pressured by organised criminals into carrying drugs across the border.
The Belfast Telegraph gives substantial space to today’s 9/11 anniversary:
“World prepares to remember 9/11 on 25th anniversary of terror attacks”
Its large photograph shows the Tribute in Light in New York, accompanied by an inset image of the World Trade Center under attack in 2001.
But its main Northern Ireland story is a court report:
“Mum who filmed teenage son as he rioted avoids jail”
with the subheading:
“Woman guilty of cruelty to child after incident during Belfast disorder”
The paper reports that Michelle Greer received a 12-month sentence for child cruelty, suspended for three years. According to the front-page account, she recorded her teenage son during disorder rather than intervening.
So unlike some crime headlines where we need to emphasise that allegations remain unproven, this front page is reporting a conviction and sentence.
Scotland
The Daily Record has by some distance the most confrontational Scottish front page:
“WOMEN’S SAFETY SHOCKER”
followed by:
“TATE AND THE PINK LADIES”
and:
“Anti-immigration group slammed for backing ‘misogynist’”
The story concerns a planned Pink Ladies demonstration in Glasgow and support for it from an anti-immigration organisation which the Record says has also backed Andrew Tate.
There are several layers of claim and counter-claim here which are worth separating. The Pink Ladies present their demonstration as a protest concerned with women’s safety and sexual violence; opponents accuse the group and some of its supporters of exploiting violence against women to advance anti-immigration politics. Counter-demonstrations are planned, and Police Scotland is preparing a substantial operation for the competing protests.
The Record’s words “SHOCKER” and “misogynist” therefore give the front page a campaigning character rather than the neutral language one would expect in a broadcast script.
Sport provides the other major element, with Rangers manager Russell Martin’s successor Kevin McInnes saying:
“Ibrox crowd can roar us to glory against Celts”
while Strictly Come Dancing returns on the entertainment side of the page.
The Scotsman takes us firmly into Scotland’s public services:
“Overworked ambulance staff ‘affecting patient safety’”
and:
“‘Excessive’ hours now routine with knock-on effects, says union”
The paper reports union concerns that ambulance staff are routinely working beyond their scheduled finishing times because of workload pressures and that this is affecting both staff welfare and, according to the union, patient safety.
Again, attribution matters: the patient-safety warning is being made by the union. The Scottish Ambulance Service, according to the front page, says it has not requested a meeting with management over the issue and points to measures intended to improve services.
The centre of the page is devoted to:
“9/11 anniversary: Shining tribute”
with Manhattan’s Tribute in Light dominating the photograph.
And politics appears on the right:
“Burnham insists new referendum is still ‘off limits’”
concerning another Scottish independence referendum.
The Herald has an investigative political story:
“Hidden papers reveal doubts over £500m First Homes Fund”
with:
“Disclosures raise fresh questions over value for money offered by scheme”
The paper says documents obtained through freedom-of-information requests show officials had concerns about aspects of the Scottish Government’s proposed £500 million First Homes Fund and its potential value for money.
The distinction between officials raising concerns during policy development and a conclusion that the eventual scheme is necessarily poor value is important. The front page says ministers subsequently altered elements of the scheme.
The Herald also marks September 11 with:
“New York lights up in Towers tribute”
while another substantial investigation warns:
“‘Slow death’ fear as ferry port faces three-year closure”
concerning the potential redevelopment of Ardrossan harbour.
And another legal challenge appears beneath the photograph:
“Government taken to court over approval for Edinburgh ‘super-hostel’”
Here “super-hostel” is itself a campaigning description used by opponents of the proposed accommodation project.
Wales
The Western Mail, the self-described National Newspaper of Wales, leads on the health service:
“Patient’s pain during six-year wait for op”
The paper reports on a patient who waited six years for a hip replacement and says an investigation has criticised the management of orthopaedic waiting lists by Swansea Bay University Health Board.
The front page says the patient was left in pain and with reduced mobility. This is an interesting contrast with today’s national newspaper agenda: while Westminster is arguing about visitor taxes and devolution, the Western Mail puts the practical delivery of healthcare at the centre of its front page.
The upper half is dominated by a Welsh sporting farewell:
“FAREWELL FOR SPORTING HERO”
and:
“Crowds line streets for funeral of rugby league great Billy Boston”
with the hearse carrying the word “LEGEND” in flowers.
There is also a teaser for:
“PLANE IN EMERGENCY LANDING”
which takes us to the other Welsh front page.
The South Wales Echo makes that aviation incident its enormous splash:
“EMERGENCY LANDING FOR PLANE AFTER BIRD STRIKE”
and underneath:
“AIRCRAFT RETURNED TO AIRPORT MINUTES AFTER TAKE-OFF”
The important point here is that the aircraft returned following a reported bird strike; nothing on the front page suggests a wider failure of air-traffic systems of the kind that affected Britain earlier in the week.
The Echo also marks the funeral of Sir Billy Boston:
“FAREWELL TO SIR BILLY BOSTON”
while across the very top is another education story:
“MUM’S DESPAIR OVER DAUGHTER’S EDUCATION”
So the two Welsh papers share some stories but make quite different editorial choices: healthcare waiting times for the Western Mail; an aviation emergency for the Echo.
England
The Manchester Evening News leads on a completed criminal case:
“‘Dangerous’ brothers jailed for brutal street attack”
and:
“VICTIM ‘ASKED DEFENDANT TO STOP HITTING DOG’”
The photographs identify Reece Taylor and Paul Taylor. Because the men have now been jailed, “jailed” and the resulting convictions distinguish this from an allegation awaiting trial. The word “dangerous”, however, is placed in quotation marks and should remain attributed rather than simply becoming the reviewer’s description.
Football, unsurprisingly for Manchester, is prominent too:
“United thrash minnows on Euro return”
while Manchester City’s Rayan Bouaddi is pictured alongside:
“Bouaddi focused on first derby for City”
It is an intensely local front page: crime, football and the return of the city’s Christmas markets.
And finally The Yorkshire Post, which provides a fascinating regional counterpoint to the national newspapers’ hostile treatment of the English visitor levy.
Its headline is:
“Mayors praise plan for visitor tax”
with the explanation:
“Leaders set to be given powers to charge levy to aid local areas amid fears new fee could lead to job cuts”
That is almost the mirror image of the Mail, Sun and Telegraph front pages we have just reviewed.
The underlying policy is exactly the same: English mayors are to receive powers to introduce an Overnight Visitor Levy, charged as a percentage of accommodation costs, with locally raised proceeds retained for investment. It is optional rather than an automatic nationwide tax. GOV.UK
The Yorkshire Post foregrounds the argument for the policy: regional leaders say the money could support tourism, public transport and local services. But it also records hospitality-industry concerns about possible job losses.
That makes today’s collection particularly instructive. Compare:
Daily Mail: “BURNHAM’S HOLIDAY TAX TO HAMMER FAMILIES ON UK BREAKS”
with:
Yorkshire Post: “Mayors praise plan for visitor tax”
Neither headline alters the policy itself. What changes is whose perspective is placed first. National papers hostile to the proposal concentrate on holidaymakers and hospitality businesses; this regional paper foregrounds mayors who would gain both the power and the revenue. The government itself describes the measure as an Overnight Visitor Levy intended to allow money to be reinvested locally.
And a special mention for Metro
Metro, the UK-wide free newspaper, abandons conventional front-page news design almost completely today.
Its page is dominated by an elegant typographical representation of the Twin Towers:
“9.11”
and simply:
“25 years”
Its accompanying words are restrained:
“2,977 died on a day of terror that shook the world. But 9/11’s deadly legacy goes on as cancers claim lives of thousands who breathed in its clouds of toxic dust”
Like the Daily Mirror among the national papers, Metro therefore moves beyond anniversary commemoration to the continuing health consequences among survivors, emergency workers and others exposed to the toxic material released after the collapse of the World Trade Center.
Visually, it is probably the most deliberately commemorative front page among these ten — using space, typography and the outline of the towers rather than a sensational headline.
And the regional papers overall…
What today’s selection demonstrates particularly well is why regional journalism adds something that cannot be obtained simply by reading the national press.
In Northern Ireland, neither newspaper leads on the Westminster stories dominating London-based titles. The Irish News is concerned with postal delays in Derry and the physical safety of a building in Pump Street; the Belfast Telegraph combines a local court case with the international commemoration of 9/11.
In Scotland, three completely different priorities emerge. The Record enters the contentious politics surrounding women’s safety, immigration and this weekend’s Glasgow demonstrations. The Scotsman investigates ambulance-service working conditions. The Herald examines the development of a £500 million Scottish housing policy. Those are three quite separate definitions of what matters to Scottish readers this morning.
In Wales, public services and personal consequences dominate: a six-year wait for surgery in the Western Mail and an aircraft’s emergency return after a bird strike in the Echo. Both also make space for the funeral of Welsh rugby league legend Sir Billy Boston.
In northern England, the Manchester Evening News gives us a classic city-paper mixture of courts, football and local life, while the Yorkshire Post provides perhaps the most politically revealing comparison of the morning.
The visitor levy is an especially good example of how newspaper selection and language can influence the reader before the article has even begun. Yesterday’s government announcement gives English mayors the option of introducing a percentage levy on overnight accommodation and retaining the proceeds locally. The hospitality industry strongly opposes the proposal, while supporting mayors regard it as an important piece of fiscal devolution.
Thus one set of newspapers can call it a “holiday tax” that will “hammer families”, while the Yorkshire Post can report that “Mayors praise plan for visitor tax”. Both are selecting genuine elements of the argument; neither headline alone gives us the whole argument.
And finally, one story transcends almost all geographical boundaries today: September 11, 2001. The Belfast Telegraph remembers the attack itself; the Scotsman and Herald show New York’s Tribute in Light; and Metro concentrates on the continuing medical legacy.
So if the national newspapers this morning gave us Westminster politics, taxation, assisted dying and the global economy, these ten front pages bring the camera much closer to the ground: a late letter in Derry, an ambulance crew working beyond its hours, a Welsh patient waiting six years for an operation, an aircraft returning after a bird strike, a court case in Manchester, and regional leaders arguing that money raised from visitors should remain in their communities.
That contrast is precisely what makes the nations-and-regions element of this continuing newspaper survey so revealing: the national press tells us what Britain is talking about; the regional press very often tells us what people are actually experiencing.
CIoJ LinkedIn news stories, Hold The Front Page news stories, Guardian media news stories, Press Gazette news stories, Arab News media stories and other stories from miscellaneous sources
The Institute calls on Belarus to release the journalists and media workers it has detained. Belarus is currently ranked 165th out of 180 countries in the World Press Freedom Index. See: https://rsf.org/en/country/belarus RSF states: ‘To silence independent journalists, the authorities have resorted to state-sponsored terrorism, including censorship, violence, mass arrests, and coordinated raids on homes and media offices, as well as disbanding the Association of Belarusian Journalists (BAJ) … between 500 and 600 journalists have been forced into exile, and most of those who have stayed back work clandestinely. Targeted by the police, they are arrested, searched, sometimes assaulted, and mistreated in prison.’
The CIoJ calls on all governments and states unjustly detaining journalists for doing their professional work to respect freedom of expression, the right to liberty and free them immediately. See: https://rsf.org/en/new-record-number-journalists-jailed-worldwide
North American Newspapers for Friday 11th September 2026
North American newspaper review — Friday 11 September 2026
Eight newspapers from the United States and two from Canada, all dated Friday 11 September 2026.
This is a particularly striking North American selection because the 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks overwhelms the visual agenda. Seven of the eight American papers give 9/11 substantial front-page treatment, several devoting almost the entire page to remembrance. The two Canadian papers also commemorate the anniversary, but through distinctively Canadian experiences of that day.
We begin in New York, with the Spanish-language El Diario, whose front page is almost entirely devoted to the anniversary.
Its enormous headline reads:
“Que jamás se repita”
— “May it never happen again.”
Above it:
“Los hispanos de la Gran Manzana reflexionan sobre los 25 años de los atentados terroristas que marcaron un antes y un después para la vida de los neoyorquinos”
— “Hispanics in the Big Apple reflect on the 25 years since the terrorist attacks that marked a before and after in the lives of New Yorkers.”
The paper also highlights the testimony of a Puerto Rican detective who served at the World Trade Center in both 1993 and 2001, and looks at the educational work of the 9/11 Museum for generations born after the attacks.
The photograph is not of destruction. Instead, it shows visitors contemplating the victims’ names at the memorial. That gives El Diario’s front page a particularly reflective character: memory seen through the contemporary multicultural population of New York.
The Houston Chronicle also marks the anniversary, but through an intensely personal Texas story:
“Woman’s legacy still touching others”
The woman is Lauren Catuzzi Grandcolas, a Houston native who was among those killed aboard United Airlines Flight 93.
The paper concentrates on what followed her death — including proceeds from her book being used to assist students, mothers and infants.
But perhaps the most thought-provoking headline on this page is:
“Islamophobia worse than after 9/11, leaders say”
That is explicitly an assessment by Muslim community leaders interviewed by the Chronicle, rather than an independently established measurement. The article considers anti-Muslim prejudice in Texas 25 years after the attacks and places contemporary attitudes alongside those experienced immediately afterwards.
There is politics too:
“Trump calls on backers to vote”
with President Trump warning Republicans at the party’s Dallas convention against losing control of Congress.
And at the bottom:
“Kirk allies remember talents, lament void a year after death”
marking a year since the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
The Miami Herald produces one of the day’s most powerful commemorative front pages.
Across an archival photograph of firefighters at Ground Zero are simply the words:
“REMEMBERING 9/11 — 25 YEARS LATER”
Below, the paper writes:
“On Sept. 11, 2001, a series of terror attacks in New York, Washington D.C., and Pennsylvania carved scars across our nation that continue to heal.”
The Herald explicitly sets out to consider both “the tragedy of that day and the triumphs that rose from the ashes.”
Its principal contemporary investigation sits alongside:
“How politics in Miami and Cuba killed secret negotiations, U.S. energy deal”
The paper reports that back-channel negotiations during an earlier Trump administration proposed an energy agreement with Cuba, but that Cuban hesitation and political opposition in Miami prevented the arrangement from proceeding.
Because this is an exclusive based partly on unnamed sources, the precise causal claim belongs to the Herald’s reporting and should be treated as such rather than as an independently established historical conclusion.
The Sacramento Bee, on the opposite side of the United States, uses almost exactly the same commemorative presentation as the Miami Herald:
“REMEMBERING 9/11 — 25 YEARS LATER”
Again, the central image is of three New York firefighters raising the American flag amid the ruins at Ground Zero.
But the surrounding stories immediately return the reader to Californian affairs.
One reports:
“Elk Grove police say Flock camera safeguards have improved”
concerning the controversial use of automated licence-plate recognition cameras.
Another national political story says:
“Trump administration proposes sweeping census overhaul”
The proposal, according to the front-page report, includes changes concerning citizenship and potentially questions about ethnicity and sexual orientation.
And locally:
“Sacramento RT to buy new natural gas buses”
— a public-transport decision which the paper notes represents a departure from an earlier commitment towards zero-emission technology.
So the Sacramento Bee combines national remembrance with highly practical local government reporting.
New York and Washington
The New York Times is visually much quieter.
At the top are simply the words:
“REFLECTIONS ON 9/11”
The enormous black-and-white photograph shows Manhattan before the attacks, the Twin Towers standing on the skyline beyond the Statue of Liberty.
Its principal anniversary story is:
“Listen to This Tour Guide. She Lived It.”
followed by:
“25 Years Later, Telling Hushed Visitors About the Day Everything Changed”
The guide featured by the Times was herself working in Lower Manhattan on September 11.
That editorial choice is revealing. Rather than reproducing the most familiar images of aircraft, fire or collapsing towers, the Times concentrates upon the transmission of memory — somebody who experienced the event explaining it to visitors who increasingly did not.
Its accompanying special section promises:
“A look back at the day and the years since, tributes to who and what was lost, and a glimpse into the future.”
The official New York commemoration today includes the traditional reading by relatives of the victims’ names and seven moments of silence, including one specifically recognising those who subsequently died from 9/11-related illness and injury.
But the Times also has a major international lead:
“HOUTHIS’ SEIZURE OF RED SEA PORT RAISES OIL RISKS”
with:
“SAUDI ALLY PUSHED OUT”
The paper reports that Houthi forces have captured the Yemeni port city of Mokha from forces allied with the internationally recognised Yemeni government. Its significance is geographical as much as military: control there could strengthen the Iran-backed Houthis’ position near an important international shipping route.
The Washington Post gives perhaps the most journalistic rather than ceremonial treatment of the anniversary.
Its extraordinary central photograph shows a first responder standing amid the ruins of the World Trade Center.
The simple heading is:
“9/11: 25 YEARS LATER”
But its main anniversary article takes one consequence of September 11 and follows it into American political life:
“Enlisting after 9/11, now in Congress”
and:
“Two veterans in different parties took disparate lessons from tragedy”
The Post therefore examines how two people who responded to the attacks through military service subsequently reached different political conclusions.
Elsewhere the political story dominating several American front pages appears:
“A new twist in map saga”
with:
“PRO-GOP REDRAW IN MO. IS BLOCKED AGAIN”
The US Supreme Court has prevented Missouri from using a Republican-drawn congressional map for November’s midterm elections. The proposed boundaries would have improved Republican prospects of gaining another House seat; the state will instead use its previous map while the dispute continues.
And there is a particularly contemporary media story:
“Podcaster attacking ChatGPT tied to rival”
The Post reports on undisclosed financial interests involving a commentator who had criticised ChatGPT. The significance of the story is therefore less about whether criticism of artificial intelligence is legitimate — clearly it can be — than about transparency concerning potential conflicts of interest.
The Washington Times adopts a much more explicitly interpretative treatment of the anniversary:
“War on terror carries complex legacy”
with:
“25 years of fights remade America, and its enemies”
Its photographs juxtapose smoke rising from Lower Manhattan on September 11 with the Pentagon following the attack.
The accompanying analysis considers the quarter-century of American military and counter-terrorism policy which followed.
That phrase “complex legacy” is significant. Twenty-five years on, American newspapers are no longer simply commemorating September 11 as an isolated atrocity; they are evaluating the wars, security policies, surveillance, geopolitical consequences and political changes which followed it.
The paper also carries:
“In Dallas, Vance steals spotlight with eye on 2028”
The suggestion that Vice-President JD Vance is positioning himself for the 2028 presidential election is political interpretation rather than an announced candidacy. At the Republican convention, Vance has been urging supporters to concentrate first on November’s midterms, while President Trump has asked supporters to behave as though he himself were on the ballot.
Another prominent headline reads:
“President’s $5,000 check pledge latest bid in a long history”
Trump has proposed $5,000 payments to American adults if Republicans retain congressional control, saying tariff and investment revenues would finance them. Questions have been raised about both the economics and implementation of the proposal.
USA Today Weekend distils the anniversary into one sentence:
“Attacks still shaping nation”
Beside it:
“SEPT. 11 — 25 YEARS LATER”
and:
“Where were you? Americans of all ages remember”
Its approach is deliberately generational. The paper points out that almost 100 million Americans — nearly one-third of the population — have no personal memory of September 11.
That makes its central question particularly effective. For older Americans, “Where were you?” evokes an autobiographical memory. For younger Americans, September 11 is already history learned from parents, teachers, museums, archives and journalism.
The political lead alongside it is again Missouri:
“Missouri map is blocked again”
with:
“High court ends GOP’s redistricting maneuver”
That characterisation — “maneuver” — belongs to USA Today’s headline language. The underlying fact is that the Supreme Court blocked use of the new Republican-favoured map; its unsigned emergency order offered no explanation and recorded no public dissent.
And now to Canada
The Globe and Mail finds a uniquely Canadian route into the September 11 anniversary:
“A Newfoundland town took in strangers on 9/11 — and became a second home”
and:
“Even at a tense time for U.S. relations, bonds forged in Gander endure”
This is the story of Gander, Newfoundland, where aircraft unable to enter United States airspace after the attacks were diverted.
The Globe revisits the relationships created when residents of a town of fewer than 10,000 suddenly accommodated thousands of stranded passengers.
It is a clever choice for a Canadian front page because it connects the international catastrophe with an episode that became part of Canada’s own national memory of September 11.
And the Globe explicitly contrasts those enduring personal bonds with today’s much more difficult political relationship.
Its political lead says:
“PM plays down Trump’s latest trade actions as government mulls response”
Prime Minister Mark Carney has described Washington’s latest trade measures as “relatively modest” in the context of the much larger US-Canada dispute and has signalled that Ottawa may not immediately retaliate further.
Another fascinating economic headline reads:
“Just 15,600 Chinese EVs have entered country under Carney-Xi deal”
So the Globe’s front page moves between Canada’s historic friendship with ordinary Americans and its increasingly complicated economic relationships with both the United States and China.
The Toronto Star also remembers September 11, but much less prominently:
“Haunting, vivid memories from day the towers fell”
Its principal photograph instead belongs to the Toronto International Film Festival:
“Lights, cameras, action”
with:
“All eyes on red carpet for film festival’s opening night”
That is itself an interesting editorial decision. The 25th anniversary is unquestionably important, but the Star remains a Toronto newspaper and gives the city’s major cultural event enormous prominence.
Its principal national political headline is:
“Carney keeping line open to Trump”
with:
“PM says leaders have talked, despite U.S. president’s recent trade taunts”
Again, this reflects Carney’s notably restrained response to the latest escalation. Canada has recently retaliated against earlier American tariffs, but the Prime Minister is signalling caution about immediately escalating further.
And locally:
“Inspection issues linked to derailment”
reports on a Metrolinx investigation into the GO train derailment at Union Station.
The top of the page also carries two Ontario political and institutional stories:
“Ford shakeup”
and:
“More job cuts”
concerning a provincial cabinet reshuffle and further reductions at the Ontario Science Centre.
And the North American papers overall…
What is extraordinary about these ten front pages is not simply that September 11 dominates them, but how differently newspapers choose to remember the same historical event.
El Diario asks New York’s Hispanic community what the anniversary means and says “Que jamás se repita” — “May it never happen again.”
The Miami Herald and Sacramento Bee return directly to the ruins of Ground Zero and the iconic image of firefighters raising the American flag.
The New York Times does almost the opposite. It shows us Manhattan before the towers were destroyed and concentrates on a survivor explaining the day to people who did not experience it.
The Washington Post examines two military veterans whose responses to September 11 eventually carried them into Congress — but into different political parties and different interpretations of what followed.
The Washington Times asks about the consequences of the subsequent “war on terror”.
USA Today asks simply:
“Where were you?”
while recognising that tens of millions of today’s Americans cannot answer the question because they had not yet been born.
The Houston Chronicle considers both the personal legacy of a Flight 93 victim and a darker social legacy through Muslim leaders’ concerns about Islamophobia.
And then The Globe and Mail reminds us that September 11 was not solely an American experience. Its story of Gander remembers thousands of airline passengers unexpectedly arriving in Newfoundland after US airspace was closed — and the friendships that resulted.
That diversity of treatment seems appropriate to a 25th anniversary. The immediate shock has moved into history, but it remains within living memory. The journalism consequently moves beyond what happened towards what it meant, what followed, what was learned, and what should now be remembered. Today’s official commemorations themselves recognise that expanding historical perspective, including those who have died from illnesses associated with exposure to the attacks and their aftermath.
And outside the anniversary, three contemporary themes stand out. American electoral politics is becoming increasingly intense ahead of the November midterms, with the Missouri redistricting battle reaching the Supreme Court and the Republican convention in Dallas already encouraging speculation about 2028. Canada-US relations remain strained by tariffs, although Mark Carney is conspicuously resisting an immediate further escalation. And the New York Times reminds us that today’s geopolitical dangers have not stopped for an anniversary, with the Houthi capture of Mokha threatening another important maritime route at a time of already heightened pressure on global energy markets.
But for this Friday, 11 September 2026, there is really only one dominant North American front-page story. Twenty-five years after the attacks, newspapers from New York to California — and across the border in Canada — are collectively performing one of journalism’s oldest functions: turning yesterday’s first draft of history into today’s act of public memory.
French Newspapers for Friday 11th September 2026
French-speaking newspaper review — Friday 11 September 2026
Eight newspapers from France, one from Quebec and one from Switzerland, all dated Friday 11 September 2026. And, as with the North American papers, the 25th anniversary of 9/11 provides an important thread — although the French press approaches it much more as a question of geopolitical consequences than simply commemoration.
We begin in Corsica with Corse-Matin, where the lead is a distinctly local political confrontation.
The headline is:
“Le bras de fer”
“The stand-off”
It concerns relations between the Collectivité de Corse and the city of Ajaccio. The front page says that four days after comments by Ajaccio’s mayor and president of the CapA denouncing what he called the “inertie” — “inertia” — imposed by the Corsican regional authority, the regional executive has replied that these are:
“accusations infondées”
“unfounded accusations.”
And Corse-Matin concludes:
“Les relations s’enveniment toujours plus…”
“Relations are becoming increasingly acrimonious…”
It is a classic regional-newspaper lead: an institutional dispute given the dramatic language of a political duel.
Elsewhere, an agricultural story has the rather extraordinary headline:
“Un couple condamné pour avoir déclaré un élevage bovin fictif”
“A couple convicted after declaring a fictitious cattle farm.”
And the paper reports disruption to Corsica Linea ferry crossings because of a technical problem.
La Croix offers an altogether different front page, dominated not by politics but by culture.
Its headline is:
“Une diva à Paris”
“A diva in Paris.”
The diva is Céline Dion, and the paper investigates the reasons for the Quebec singer’s continuing extraordinary popularity as she prepares to give her first concert in Paris for almost 26 years.
It is an interesting choice for La Croix: a very restrained photograph of Dion on stage and an analytical rather than celebrity-driven headline.
At the top, the paper also advertises:
“Ce week-end dans La Croix L’Hebdo — Un dossier spécial sur le genre”
“This weekend in La Croix L’Hebdo — A special report on gender.”
And another feature promises:
“Dix portes pour entrer dans la Bible”
“Ten gateways into the Bible.”
So La Croix remains characteristically distinctive within the French national press: religion, culture and social questions rather than the harder political agenda dominating several of today’s other papers.
France’s faltering economy
Le Figaro has an altogether more sombre economic lead:
“Croissance : l’économie française en panne sèche”
“Growth: the French economy has ground to a halt.”
En panne sèche literally evokes a vehicle which has completely run out of fuel, so “running on empty” would also capture the flavour of the headline.
The underlying figure is striking. France’s national statistics institute, INSEE, has cut its forecast for French GDP growth in 2026 to just 0.4%. INSEE itself has labelled the situation “Vigilance orange sur la croissance” — effectively an “orange alert for growth.”
Le Figaro’s subheading says:
“Un décrochage alarmant qui rend inévitable le dérapage du déficit public.”
“An alarming loss of ground which makes an overshoot in the public deficit inevitable.”
That latter judgement is Le Figaro’s interpretation of the fiscal consequences rather than the growth figure itself.
The photograph introduces another theme:
“Le Pen-Bardella, un tandem à l’épreuve de la rentrée chahutée du RN”
“Le Pen-Bardella: a partnership tested by the National Rally’s turbulent political return.”
The paper examines the working relationship between Marine Le Pen and Jordan Bardella as the party prepares for the next electoral cycle.
And on today’s anniversary:
“Vingt-cinq ans après, le 11 Septembre hante toujours l’Amérique”
“Twenty-five years later, September 11 still haunts America.”
So while the American papers we have just reviewed often concentrate upon memory and individual experience, Le Figaro immediately asks what the attacks did to American politics, foreign policy and the national psyche.
Les Echos reaches essentially the same economic conclusion, but in the more clinical language of a financial newspaper:
“Croissance : la France décroche”
“Growth: France is falling behind.”
Its three bullet points explain the argument: INSEE now expects only 0.4% GDP growth, France is performing markedly worse than the eurozone as a whole, and that weaker growth makes attempts to contain the budget deficit still more difficult.
Its editorial reduces the concern to two words:
“SOS croissance”
“SOS growth.”
But Les Echos also devotes a large part of its front page to today’s anniversary:
“Ce 11-Septembre qui a changé l’Amérique”
“The September 11 that changed America.”
Here we see one of the most famous photographs of the attacks — the South Tower exploding after the impact of United Airlines Flight 175.
The accompanying text considers the enduring consequences: America’s wars, the expansion of executive power and surveillance, and the transformation of international security. Those wider consequences remain central to assessments of the attacks 25 years later.
And there is another economic headline:
“La BCE relève ses taux pour freiner la diffusion de l’inflation”
“The ECB raises interest rates to curb the spread of inflation.”
Taken together, Le Figaro and Les Echos make French economic stagnation and renewed inflationary pressure the day’s major economic story.
Twenty-five years after 9/11
Le Monde gives the anniversary its entire principal display:
“Depuis le 11-Septembre, les mutations du djihadisme”
“Since September 11: the transformations of jihadism.”
The photograph is of the Tribute in Light memorial in New York, but this is emphatically not simply a commemorative article.
Le Monde argues that although al-Qaeda has lost its former dominance, jihadism has mutated rather than disappeared. The front page says:
“Al-Qaida s’est effacée au profit de sa rivale, l’organisation Etat islamique, et survit essentiellement à travers ses filiales en Afrique.”
Or:
“Al-Qaeda has faded in favour of its rival, Islamic State, and now survives principally through its affiliates in Africa.”
That broad picture is supported by current assessments: al-Qaeda has suffered enormous leadership and organisational losses, while retaining influence through decentralised affiliates, particularly in Africa, even as Islamic State emerged as its great jihadist rival.
Le Monde then asks a wonderfully ambitious historical question:
“Le XXIe siècle est-il né dans les gravats de Ground Zero ?”
“Was the 21st century born in the rubble of Ground Zero?”
And another:
“Comment les attentats de 2001 ont changé l’extrême droite”
“How the 2001 attacks changed the far right.”
The underlying argument is that 9/11 helped shift parts of the radical right towards an increasingly anti-Islam political discourse.
This is perhaps the most intellectually ambitious 9/11 front page in today’s selection. Le Monde treats September 11 as the beginning of a historical era whose consequences are still unfolding. Its interview with former French intelligence official Yves Trotignon similarly examines how the subsequent long wars, particularly Iraq, helped transform jihadism and Western politics.
Ouest-France reaches a similar conclusion in much more direct language:
“11-Septembre : le jour où le monde a changé”
“September 11: the day the world changed.”
Its photograph shows the Tribute in Light marking the former position of the Twin Towers.
Underneath, the paper summarises the consequences:
“Géopolitique, sécurité… Vingt-cinq ans après le 11 septembre 2001, les conséquences des attentats terroristes sont multiples.”
— “Geopolitics, security… Twenty-five years after September 11, 2001, the consequences of the terrorist attacks are multiple.”
And its editorial is headed:
“La nouvelle ère de la méfiance”
“The new era of mistrust.”
That phrase encapsulates much of the French press’s anniversary treatment. The focus is not solely on grief or heroism but on what followed: wars, terrorism, surveillance, suspicion and the reshaping of international politics. Those consequences — Afghanistan and Iraq, the enormous expansion of counter-terrorism structures and surveillance, and social mistrust — also feature prominently in contemporary American reassessments of the anniversary.
Libération chooses perhaps the most arresting image of all: the moment the second aircraft strikes the World Trade Center.
Its anniversary headline is restrained:
“11 septembre — 25 ans après”
“September 11 — 25 years later.”
But underneath:
“La justice au point zéro”
“Justice at Ground Zero.”
And:
“Colum McCann se souvient”
“Colum McCann remembers.”
The main analytical lead, however, is elsewhere:
“DETTE, CLIMAT, TECH… ‘LE DÉNI EST DANGEREUX’”
— “DEBT, CLIMATE, TECH… ‘DENIAL IS DANGEROUS’.”
It is an interview with Nobel economics laureate Jean Tirole and economist Karine Van der Straeten.
The quotation is therefore their warning rather than Libération asserting as fact that a particular government or institution is “in denial”.
Visually, though, Libération’s decision to place the burning World Trade Center across almost half its front page ensures that September 11 remains the day’s overwhelming historical image.
A very different Parisian front page
Le Parisien, intriguingly, largely avoids the geopolitical agenda altogether.
Its principal headline is:
“Transmission de patrimoine — Comment aider ses proches”
“Passing on wealth — How to help your loved ones.”
The paper examines how financial assistance from families can help relatives — particularly first-time buyers — obtain property during difficult economic circumstances.
Alongside it is:
“Didier Raoult, anatomie d’une chute”
“Didier Raoult: anatomy of a fall.”
And:
“Électrification — 6 676 communes sélectionnées”
“Electrification — 6,676 municipalities selected.”
At the very top is another reminder of Céline Dion’s return:
“Hôteliers, restaurateurs… Tous disent merci à Céline Dion”
“Hoteliers, restaurateurs… Everyone is saying thank you to Céline Dion.”
That provides a useful reminder of how selective front pages are. On a day when Le Monde and Ouest-France make September 11 their dominant subject, Le Parisien chooses family finances, housing, entertainment and everyday life.
Quebec — Le Devoir
Across the Atlantic, Montreal’s Le Devoir does acknowledge the anniversary prominently at the top:
“25 ANS DU 11 SEPTEMBRE 2001”
“25 YEARS SINCE SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.”
It offers:
“Une photographie au cœur du drame”
“A photograph at the heart of the tragedy.”
and:
“Mon 11 Septembre, la chronique de Josée Blanchette”
“My September 11: Josée Blanchette’s column.”
But its main news question is very Canadian:
“Qu’est-ce qu’un produit américain ?”
“What is an American product?”
The subheading is excellent:
“La question paraît simple. La réponse ne l’est pas.”
“The question seems simple. The answer isn’t.”
The issue arises from Canada’s counter-tariffs on goods originating in the United States. Le Devoir examines the surprisingly complicated question of when something actually qualifies as an American product — raw materials, manufacture, processing and country-of-origin rules all potentially producing different answers.
Its second major headline is:
“Les pipelines contourneront une loi en environnement”
“Pipelines will bypass an environmental law.”
The paper reports that certain pipeline projects will no longer be subject to the federal Impact Assessment Act in the same way, with assessment instead falling to the Canada Energy Regulator. The federal government is indeed moving to exempt some major energy projects, including interprovincial pipelines, from part of the existing federal environmental-review process.
And culturally, the Toronto International Film Festival makes the page through Quebec filmmaker Denis Côté:
“Denis Côté dans le champ gauche”
Literally “Denis Côté in left field”, but idiomatically something like “Denis Côté off the beaten track” — appropriate for a filmmaker whose work the paper describes as singular and unsettling.
Switzerland — Le Temps
Finally to Geneva and Le Temps, which produces one of the most distinctively Swiss headlines of the day:
“C’est une prime à la délocalisation”
“It’s a reward for offshoring.”
The quotation concerns the controversy over “Swissness” rules.
The Swiss Federal Council has supported rules allowing companies, under certain circumstances, to use references such as “Swiss engineering” or “Swiss design” and the Swiss cross even where the resulting products are manufactured abroad.
The controversy has become associated particularly with Swiss footwear company On, whose shoes are produced in Asia. Critics in Swiss industry argue that this disadvantages companies which actually manufacture domestically; the government emphasises the legitimate value of research and development carried out in Switzerland.
So “prime à la délocalisation” — “reward for offshoring” — is the critical interpretation quoted by Le Temps, not a neutral description of the legislation.
Its central feature looks towards China:
“Mao, un héritage à double face”
“Mao: a two-sided legacy.”
The caption explains the generational divide 50 years after Mao’s death: older Chinese may retain memories of persecution, while some younger people remember him primarily as the founder of a powerful modern China.
There is also a major Red Sea story:
“L’écueil de Bab el-Mandeb”
“The Bab el-Mandeb obstacle.”
The paper reports on the danger posed by Houthi advances around this strategically vital maritime passage.
And Le Temps’s editorial focuses on Switzerland’s troubled F-35 procurement:
“Viola Amherd doit la vérité sur les F-35”
“Viola Amherd owes the truth about the F-35s.”
That is explicitly an editorial judgement, and should be understood as such.
And the French-speaking papers overall…
There are really three different front-page conversations taking place across these ten newspapers.
The first is September 11 as history.
The French papers are noticeably analytical. Le Monde asks how jihadism has mutated. Ouest-France calls September 11 “the day the world changed.” Les Echos examines “the September 11 that changed America.” Le Figaro says the event “still haunts America.” And Libération returns visually to the terrible instant of the attack itself.
This differs subtly from the American front pages we have just examined. The American papers frequently ask “Where were you?”, remember individual victims, survivors and first responders, or examine how memory is transmitted to younger generations. The French papers are more inclined to ask “What did September 11 do to the world?”
That is a fascinating transatlantic distinction within today’s selection.
The second theme is French economic anxiety. Le Figaro’s:
“l’économie française en panne sèche”
“the French economy running on empty”
and Les Echos’s:
“la France décroche”
“France is falling behind”
are different editorial formulations of the same underlying news: INSEE now forecasts only 0.4% growth for 2026.
And the third is a broader question of national identity in an interconnected economy. Le Devoir asks what actually makes a product “American” in an age of cross-border supply chains. Le Temps asks what can legitimately be called “Swiss” when the design and research are Swiss but manufacture takes place in Asia. Both are apparently technical economic stories which lead quickly into much larger questions about nationality, globalisation and political sovereignty.
Perhaps the most memorable contrast, however, is visual. Libération gives us the instant of catastrophe; Le Monde and Ouest-France give us the beams of memorial light; Le Devoir places the anniversary within Canadian memory; while Le Parisien largely turns away from it towards the practical question of how parents can help their children buy a home.
Taken together, these front pages demonstrate particularly well why a comparative newspaper review is so revealing. The date is the same, and the events available to every newsroom are broadly the same; what changes is the editorial judgement about which part of the world deserves to become tomorrow’s historical record.
https://x.com/CIoJournalist/status/2098300150703648787
Ten International Newspapers for Friday 11th September 2026
(A selection of 10 newspaper front pages from different countries and languages around the world)
International newspaper review — Friday 11 September 2026
We have ten front pages spanning Hungary, Taiwan, Austria, Poland, India, Greece, Brazil, Egypt, Sweden and Venezuela, and at least nine different languages or scripts.
The 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks provides the strongest common international thread, but there are also strikingly different national preoccupations: artificial intelligence, climate, BRICS diplomacy, Iran, domestic politics and even a Hungarian rock musician’s cancelled concert.
We begin in Hungary with the popular tabloid Blikk, whose front page could hardly be further removed from the solemn anniversary coverage elsewhere.
Its enormous splash concerns veteran Hungarian musician Leslie Mandoki:
“Lenyelte az elmaradt koncertekre kapott százmilliókat”
Approximately:
“He pocketed the hundreds of millions received for concerts that never took place.”
The smaller line beneath says Mandoki maintains that he will repay the money if agreement can be reached with him over the details, while the event company says negotiations have already taken place and several demands for repayment have been sent.
That distinction matters: Blikk’s giant headline is characteristically accusatory tabloid language, while the smaller text makes clear there is a dispute between the parties.
Another extraordinary headline says:
“3 hónapja tűnt el Tünde”
“Tünde disappeared three months ago.”
And another concerns the very low level of the River Tisza:
“Szárad a Tisza”
“The Tisza is drying up.”
Sport provides something rather happier:
“Szoboszlai góllal kezdett a BL-ben”
“Szoboszlai began the Champions League with a goal.”
So Blikk offers an almost entirely domestic and popular-news agenda.
Taiwan — China Times
Taiwan’s China Times has a much more geopolitical front page.
Its enormous main headline reads:
“川普點名台灣 讚：我們就贏贏贏”
Broadly:
“Trump singles out Taiwan, saying: ‘We just win, win, win.’”
The accompanying report concerns Donald Trump’s presentation of his trade and economic policy and his repeated invocation of Taiwan in discussing semiconductor production and American industrial policy.
The quotation is therefore Trump’s language, not China Times endorsing the proposition.
But arguably the more remarkable story is at the bottom:
“AI末日 10年內人類滅亡風險達1成”
Or:
“AI apocalypse: a one-in-ten risk of human extinction within ten years.”
That is a startling formulation. The story discusses warnings by AI researchers about catastrophic risks from increasingly capable systems. It should be read as a report of risk estimates and predictions, not as a prediction by the newspaper that humanity has a 10% probability of disappearing by 2036.
There is also extensive basketball coverage as Taiwan prepares for the Asian Games.
Austria — Der Standard
Vienna’s Der Standard gives us one of the day’s clearest climate headlines:
“August war weltweit der heißeste Monat der Messgeschichte”
“August was the hottest month worldwide in recorded history.”
And underneath:
“16,96 Grad globale Durchschnittstemperatur”
“16.96 degrees global average temperature.”
The paper also says the Mediterranean reached a heat record.
But the visual centre of the page belongs to September 11. Against the Tribute in Light in Manhattan is the poignant headline:
“Zwei Türme, die nicht verschwinden”
“Two towers that do not disappear.”
The caption explains that 25 years after the terrorist attacks, New York remembers the nearly 3,000 people killed, while the two columns of blue light symbolise the Twin Towers.
It is a wonderfully economical piece of headline writing: the physical towers disappeared, but the towers of memory have not.
Elsewhere, Der Standard says:
“EZB dreht erneut an Zinsschraube”
“ECB turns the interest-rate screw again.”
And education appears too:
“Pisa-Absturz beim Lesen geht nicht auf das Konto der Migranten”
— approximately:
“The PISA collapse in reading cannot be blamed on migrants.”
That connects interestingly with the PISA debate we saw across the French and Swiss newspapers earlier this week.
Poland — Gazeta Wyborcza
In Poland, Gazeta Wyborcza produces perhaps the most uncompromising 9/11 headline in this international collection.
Above it:
“25 lat po atakach na USA”
“25 years after the attacks on the USA.”
And then:
“Ameryka powinna uważać na siebie”
— “America should beware of itself.”
The subheading explains the argument:
“Amerykanom udało się zapobiec powtórce wielkiego ataku terrorystycznego w ich kraju, ale zapłacili za to wysoką cenę.”
— “Americans succeeded in preventing a repeat of a major terrorist attack in their country, but they paid a high price for it.”
The accompanying commentary argues that the response to September 11 produced consequences for American society and institutions themselves.
That makes an interesting comparison with today’s French press. Le Monde asks how jihadism changed after 9/11; Gazeta Wyborcza asks what America’s response to jihadism did to America.
The photograph of the burning World Trade Center makes the historical reference unavoidable, but the newspaper’s real subject is the political legacy.
India — Hindustan
Hindi-language Hindustan looks principally towards this weekend’s BRICS summit in New Delhi.
Its huge headline reads:
“ब्रिक्स के लिए आज से दिल्ली किले में तब्दील”
— “From today, Delhi turns into a fortress for BRICS.”
The paper reports extensive security arrangements as international delegations arrive.
That description is certainly borne out by events: New Delhi has been placed under unusually tight security and traffic restrictions ahead of the summit, with major delegations arriving for meetings involving leaders including Narendra Modi, Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping.
The geopolitical significance is considerable. BRICS has expanded far beyond its original five members, but the current war involving Iran has also exposed significant disagreements within the grouping, particularly between Iran and the UAE.
There is a sporting headline:
“हॉकी में पाक, क्रिकेट में बांग्लादेश को धोया”
A lively colloquial translation would be:
“Pakistan beaten in hockey, Bangladesh thrashed in cricket.”
Dhoya literally means “washed”, but in sporting Hindi it conveys the familiar journalistic sense of giving an opponent a drubbing.
And September 11 appears in a smaller sidebar:
“गुजरात की हुमैना 9/11 का शिकार”
The wording refers to a Gujarat connection with a victim of 9/11.
Greece — Kathimerini
Athens newspaper Kathimerini presents a strikingly serious and varied front page.
Its principal headline is:
“Η σκοτεινή αγορά της τεχνητής ευεξίας”
— “The dark market of artificial wellness.”
The story concerns two doctors arrested over alleged unauthorised treatments being presented as regenerative or anti-ageing medicine.
As this involves arrests and allegations, the wording should not be taken as establishing criminal guilt.
Another prominent headline warns:
“Συναγερμός για την απειλή από την ανεξέλεγκτη AI”
— “Alarm over the threat from uncontrolled AI.”
That makes a fascinating pairing with Taiwan’s China Times. Two newspapers separated by thousands of miles independently put potentially uncontrolled artificial intelligence prominently on their front pages.
Kathimerini also marks September 11 through commentary:
“Η 11η Σεπτεμβρίου και οι φωτιές σήμερα”
Approximately:
“September 11 and today’s fires.”
The column reflects on the continuing consequences of the attacks and the conflicts that followed.
Energy prices are another concern:
“Εφιάλτης η θέρμανση τον φετινό χειμώνα”
— “Heating this winter could be a nightmare.”
The paper links that concern to high oil and natural-gas prices.
Brazil — O Globo
Brazil’s O Globo leads not on September 11 but on a major judicial and political controversy.
Its headline:
“Fachin manda Mendonça levantar sigilo do caso Master”
— “Fachin tells Mendonça to lift secrecy in the Master case.”
The smaller line provides an important qualification:
“Gabinete do relator começa a cumprir decisão, cuja extensão ainda é incerta.”
— “The reporting judge’s office begins implementing the decision, whose extent remains uncertain.”
That qualification is important because the disclosure is partial rather than necessarily comprehensive: material which might prejudice continuing investigations can remain protected. Contemporary reporting similarly stresses that Mendonça retains considerable discretion over what becomes public.
The case has become entangled in a wider institutional and political struggle within Brazil’s Supreme Court and Federal Police.
But O Globo gives an enormous photograph to September 11:
“25 anos do fim de uma era”
— “25 years since the end of an era.”
The paper says:
“As cenas mais impactantes das últimas décadas completam um quarto de século com o mundo já bastante diferente de 2001.”
— “The most shocking scenes of recent decades mark a quarter-century with the world already very different from that of 2001.”
It is another revealing formulation. For O Globo, September 11 represents not merely an event but the ending of one historical era and the beginning of another.
Egypt — Al Shorouk
Egypt’s Al Shorouk is dominated by the continuing conflict involving Iran.
Its main red headline reads:
“مستشار الرئيس الأمريكي يحذرونه من استمرار حرب إيران حتى عام 2029”
Approximately:
“US presidential advisers warn of the Iran war continuing until 2029.”
The smaller text refers to an Iranian official and expectations of prolonged fighting, together with engineering measures connected with American military bases.
The broader context is important: the continuing war has disrupted regional trade and energy supplies, including traffic around the Strait of Hormuz, with oil prices above $100 a barrel — precisely the sort of economic consequence also appearing on European front pages. Reuters
Another large headline concerns Donald Trump:
“ترامب يعد كل أمريكي بـ ٥ آلاف دولار حال فوز الجمهوريين بالانتخابات”
— “Trump promises every American $5,000 if Republicans win the elections.”
That is Trump’s political promise and should be attributed to him rather than treated as an established future payment.
And Gaza remains prominent:
“الأمم المتحدة تحذر: مخزونات الإمدادات الأساسية في غزة غير كافية”
— “United Nations warns: stocks of essential supplies in Gaza are insufficient.”
So Al Shorouk’s front page is overwhelmingly concerned with war, diplomacy, energy and the Middle East.
Sweden — Svenska Dagbladet
In Sweden, Svenska Dagbladet is markedly domestic.
Its main story reads:
“Kaptenen och lotsen bestrider brott”
— “The captain and pilot deny committing an offence.”
This concerns the Tjörn accident, with visualisations from a cargo vessel’s black box forming part of the prosecution case. The front page makes clear that both defendants deny wrongdoing.
The large photograph concerns Swedish politics:
“Röster inifrån: Det blir en S-regering utan V”
— approximately:
“Voices from within: there will be a Social Democratic government without the Left Party.”
The accompanying line says that despite falling opinion-poll support, figures within the Social Democrats still expect an election victory and a government without Vänsterpartiet.
There is also another PISA-related headline:
“Skärmarna inte svar på Pisa-ras enligt forskare”
— “Screens are not the explanation for the PISA decline, according to researchers.”
That is particularly interesting beside yesterday’s La Croix, where social media and screens were explicitly part of the debate over deteriorating educational performance.
Svenska Dagbladet is therefore supplying a useful corrective: the causes of changing PISA performance remain contested, and apparently simple explanations involving screen use do not command universal academic agreement.
Venezuela — Diario 2001
And finally to Venezuela’s Diario 2001, which gives September 11 by far the largest headline on its front page:
“25 AÑOS DEL TERROR QUE DERIVÓ EN PARANOIA”
— “25 YEARS SINCE THE TERROR THAT DESCENDED INTO PARANOIA.”
That is exceptionally strong editorial language.
The subheading explains the newspaper’s argument:
“La aviación, relaciones diplomáticas, migración, geopolítica y la seguridad mundial quedaron marcadas para siempre tras los atentados de Al-Qaeda hace un cuarto de siglo en Nueva York, EEUU.”
— “Aviation, diplomatic relations, migration, geopolitics and global security were changed for ever following al-Qaeda’s attacks a quarter of a century ago in New York, United States.”
The word “paranoia” belongs to Diario 2001’s interpretation of the post-9/11 world; the broader proposition — that the attacks transformed aviation security, international relations and counter-terrorism policy — is much less contentious.
There is also an economic headline:
“Reportan alza del PIB en 7,14% durante el segundo trimestre”
— “GDP reported up 7.14% during the second quarter.”
The paper attributes that figure to the Venezuelan president and says the claimed economic recovery has translated into increased consumption.
So, as always with politically significant economic statistics, it is worth retaining the attribution rather than treating the front-page claim as independently established.
And the international papers overall…
What makes this Friday’s selection particularly rewarding is that September 11 has created something close to a genuinely global front-page conversation.
Yet the same event is being remembered in strikingly different ways.
Austria’s Der Standard gives us the poetic “Two towers that do not disappear.” Poland’s Gazeta Wyborcza warns that “America should beware of itself.” Brazil’s O Globo calls 9/11 “the end of an era.” And Venezuela’s Diario 2001 describes “25 years since the terror that descended into paranoia.”
Compare those with the French-language papers we have just reviewed: Le Monde asks how jihadism has mutated; Ouest-France calls 9/11 “the day the world changed”; Les Echos asks how it changed America; while Libération returns visually to the terrible moment itself.
There is therefore a remarkable spectrum. The attacks are fixed historical facts; their meaning after 25 years most certainly is not.
A second striking theme is anxiety about systems becoming difficult to control. Taiwan’s China Times raises catastrophic AI risk. Greece’s Kathimerini warns about “uncontrolled AI”. Austria records unprecedented heat. Hungary shows a depleted River Tisza. Egypt concentrates on a war whose duration and economic consequences are uncertain. And several European papers continue debating declining educational performance.
Then there is the emerging multipolar world. India’s Hindustan shows New Delhi effectively becoming a fortified diplomatic capital for BRICS. The summit brings together countries with substantial common interests but also deep internal disagreements — especially over Iran — illustrating simultaneously the organisation’s increasing global weight and the difficulty of turning that weight into common policy.
Perhaps today’s most revealing comparison is therefore between New York in 2001 and New Delhi in 2026. September 11 recalls the moment when American power and the American-led international order appeared to be the central organising facts of world politics. Twenty-five years later, an expanded BRICS is meeting in India expressly amid arguments about whether international power is becoming much more dispersed. That does not mean one era simply ended and another began overnight — but the juxtaposition on today’s newspapers is historically striking.
And once again these ten papers demonstrate the great value of your international set. There is no single world front page. In Budapest, a rock musician and the River Tisza command attention; in Taipei, Trump and artificial intelligence; in Vienna, climate and memory; in Warsaw, the political legacy of 9/11; in Delhi, BRICS; in Athens, AI and energy; in Rio, the Supreme Court; in Cairo, Iran and Gaza; in Stockholm, domestic politics; and in Venezuela, the legacy of the attacks themselves.
Ten newspapers, ten countries, and ten quite different answers to the journalistic question: what matters most today?
Montage of world newspapers Friday 11th September 2026
-o-
This posting has been produced with the assistance of AI editorial and production services from ChatGPT Plus and Gemini.
All Kultura Press online publications are on Open Access to support the dissemination of knowledge and understanding about journalism, journalism history and other subjects. The research and writing for this ongoing project is not funded in any way. If you would like to assist covering any of the costs involved, do consider making any kind of donation and/or subscribing monthly or yearly using the form below. Many thanks for your consideration.
-o-
Make a one-time donation
Make a monthly donation
Make a yearly donation
Choose an amount
Or enter a custom amount
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
More Open Access online publications from Kultura Press Chelsea History and Studies George Orwell Studies Media Law Studies Writing Audio Drama That’s So Goldsmiths Journalism History Studies Somerset Maugham Studies Dad’s Army Studies Joseph Conrad Studies Maigret History and Studies Writing for Broadcast Journalists 3rd Edition